Skip to main content
journal@msti-indonesia.com 081377790601
Register
Articles

Design and Performance Evaluation of an OpenClaw-Based Desktop AI Assistant Deployed on Virtual Private Server: A Comparative Study with N8N Workflow Automation

  • 1,3* STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh
  • 2 Lembaga Mitra Solusi Teknologi Informasi (L-MSTI)

* Corresponding Author: Syafrinal Syafrinal

Open Access
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59431/jda.v5i1.822
Published
Pages
26–42

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026)

Journal Dekstop Application (JDA)
June

Abstract

The escalating demand for more intelligent workflow automation has driven organizations to move beyond traditional rule-based platforms. This study designs, develops, and evaluates a Desktop AI Assistant system built on OpenClaw and deployed on a Virtual Private Server (VPS), and benchmarks its performance against N8N, a widely adopted open-source workflow automation platform. Employing a Design and Development Research (DDR) framework combined with a comparative experimental method, the research assesses both systems across three increasingly complex workflow automation scenarios: message management, task scheduling, and multi-service integration. Six evaluation metrics were recorded: response time, memory usage, CPU utilization, task completion accuracy, setup complexity, and user satisfaction as measured by the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results indicate that OpenClaw outperforms N8N on five of the six parameters. It achieves an average response time 75.5% faster (16.294 ms vs. 66.534 ms) with markedly greater consistency—standard deviation of 1.024 ms in Scenario 2 compared to N8N’s 116.228 ms. Memory usage averaged 27.7% lower (573 MB vs. 793 MB), CPU utilization 34.5% lower (28.1% vs. 42.9%), and task completion accuracy 5.6% higher (90.0% vs. 84.4%). The SUS score also favored OpenClaw at 78.4 versus 72.6. N8N holds an advantage only in setup complexity, scoring 2.18 compared with 3.25 on a 1–5 Likert scale, reflecting the benefit of its visual node-based interface for initial configuration. These findings suggest that LLM-based autonomous agent systems deployed on VPS represent a meaningful advancement over rule-based automation platforms and merit serious consideration as next-generation workflow infrastructure for organizations requiring high performance and the capacity to manage complex, multi-step tasks

Keywords

Desktop AI Assistant OpenClaw Virtual Private Server Workflow Automation Large Language Model Agent

How to Cite

Wali, M., Afkar, M. A., & Syafrinal, S. (2026). Design and Performance Evaluation of an OpenClaw-Based Desktop AI Assistant Deployed on Virtual Private Server: A Comparative Study with N8N Workflow Automation. Journal Dekstop Application (JDA), 5(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.59431/jda.v5i1.822

References

  • Alva, L., & Pandey, B. (2026). Agentic AI systems in the age of generative models: Architectures, cloud scalability, and real-world applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 59, 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-025-11458-6
  • Arzo, S. T. (2021). Towards network automation: A multi-agent based intelligent networking system [Doctoral dissertation, Università degli Studi di Trento].
  • Barra, F. L., Rodella, G., Costa, A., Scalogna, A., Carenzo, L., Monzani, A., & Corte, F. D. (2025). From prompt to platform: An agentic AI workflow for healthcare simulation scenario design. Advances in Simulation, 10(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-025-00357-z
  • Barua, S. (2024). Exploring autonomous agents through the lens of large language models: A review (arXiv:2404.04442). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.04442
  • Borsci, S., Malizia, A., Schmettow, M., Van Der Velde, F., Tariverdiyeva, G., Balaji, D., & Chamberlain, A. (2022). The chatbot usability scale: The design and pilot of a usability scale for interaction with AI-based conversational agents. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 26(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01582-9
  • Broccia, G., Cirillo, R., Ferrari, A., Lelii, L., & Spagnolo, G. O. (2025). HumAInFlow: A no-code platform for modelling and simulating human-AI workflows (Technical Report 2025/011). Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "A. Faedo," CNR. https://doi.org/10.32079/ISTI-TR-2025/011
  • Cao, J. (2024). A study on deploying large language models as agents [Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. MIT DSpace. https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/157177
  • Casaclang, H., Ionescu, B., Kim, Y., & Jo, J. Y. (2026). Self-hosted workflow automation for AI-based cybersecurity operation. Journal of The Colloquium for Information Systems Security Education, 13(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.53735/cisse.v13i1.241
  • Dibia, V. (2025). Designing multi-agent systems: Principles, patterns and implementation for AI agents. Victor Dibia.
  • Dong, H., Zhang, P., Gao, Y., Dong, X., Cheng, Y., Lu, M., & Zheng, S. (2025). Finch: Benchmarking finance & accounting across spreadsheet-centric enterprise workflows (arXiv:2512.13168). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.13168
  • Ependi, U., Kurniawan, T. B., & Panjaitan, F. (2019). System usability scale vs heuristic evaluation: A review. Simetris: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, Elektro dan Ilmu Komputer, 10(1), 65–74.
  • Ferrag, M. A., Tihanyi, N., & Debbah, M. (2025). From LLM reasoning to autonomous AI agents: A comprehensive review (arXiv:2504.19678). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.19678
  • Guran, N., Knauf, F., Ngo, M., Petrescu, S., & Rellermeyer, J. S. (2024). Towards a middleware for large language models (arXiv:2411.14513). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.14513
  • Hua, Y., Li, K., Wang, R., Liu, Y., Leng, J., Wang, G., & Yan, Y. (2025). Towards proactive and collaborative industrial AI agents within the human-agent interaction (HAI): A review and perspective (SSRN 6076349). SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6076349
  • Jeong, C. (2025). Beyond text: Implementing multimodal large language model-powered multi-agent systems using a no-code platform. Journal of Intelligence and Information Systems, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.13088/jiis.2025.31.1.191
  • Jin, W., Wang, N., Zhang, L., Tian, X., Shi, B., & Zhao, B. (2025). A review of AI-driven automation technologies: Latest taxonomies, existing challenges, and future prospects. Computers, Materials & Continua, 84(3). https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.060801
  • Joshi, S. (2025). Review of autonomous systems and collaborative AI agent frameworks (SSRN 5142205). SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=5142205
  • Koubaa, A. (2025). Agent operating systems (Agent-OS): A blueprint architecture for real-time, secure, and scalable AI agents (Preprint). Authorea. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202509.0077.v1
  • Lanham, M. (2025). AI agents in action. Simon and Schuster.
  • Lee, Y. S., & Moon, P. J. (2025). A comparative study of modern automation tools: Make, n8n, and Opal. The International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 14(4), 605–615. https://www.earticle.net/Article/A481228
  • Lei, Y., Xu, J., Liang, C. X., Bi, Z., Li, X., Zhang, D., & Yu, Z. (2025). Large language model agents: A comprehensive survey on architectures, capabilities, and applications (Preprint). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202512.2119.v1
  • Lu, L., Gu, X., Huang, J., Du, J., Zheng, X., Liu, Y., & Pang, S. (2025). DREAM: Dynamic red-teaming across environments for AI models (arXiv:2512.19016). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.19016
  • Luo, J., Zhang, W., Yuan, Y., Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Gu, Y., & Zhang, M. (2025). Large language model agent: A survey on methodology, applications and challenges (arXiv:2503.21460). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.21460
  • Mahmoud, E. (2025). Enhancing hosting infrastructure management with AI-powered automation [Bachelor's thesis, Theseus]. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/882571
  • Nazmunisha, N. (2026). Multi-agent human-AI systems with low-code platforms enabling adaptive web services and real-time anomaly remediation in distributed architectures (Preprint). Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202601.1877.v1
  • Ni, K., Hua, W., Shi, X., Guo, J., Chang, S., & Chen, T. (2026). Chimera: Latency- and performance-aware multi-agent serving for heterogeneous LLMs (arXiv:2603.22206). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.22206
  • Park, G., Lee, S., & Park, Y. (2026). Minimizing response latency in LLM-based agent systems: A survey. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3664226
  • Pattnayak, P., & Bohra, H. (2025). Review of tools for zero-code LLM based application development. In World Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Advances and Applications (pp. 294–312). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-13803-3_24
  • Racharla, N. K. (2025). Agentic AI for end-to-end investment banking automation: A no-code approach using GPT, Zapier, and Airtable (SSRN 5263449). SSRN. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5263449
  • Wang, X., Rosenberg, S., Michelini, J., Smith, C., Tran, H., Nyst, E., & Neubig, G. (2025). The OpenHands software agent SDK: A composable and extensible foundation for production agents (arXiv:2511.03690). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.03690
  • Wali, A., Mahamad, S., & Sulaiman, S. (2023). Task automation intelligent agents: A review. Future Internet, 15(6), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi15060196
  • Xu, R., & Peng, J. (2025). A comprehensive survey of deep research: Systems, methodologies, and applications (arXiv:2506.12594). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.12594
  • Yang, T., Feng, P., Guo, Q., Zhang, J., Zhang, X., Ning, J., & Mao, Z. (2025). AutoHMA-LLM: Efficient task coordination and execution in heterogeneous multi-agent systems using hybrid large language models. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, 11(2), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2025.3528892
  • Yu, C., Cheng, Z., Cui, H., Gao, Y., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2025). A survey on agent workflow: Status and future. In Proceedings of the 2025 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD) (pp. 770–781). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD64986.2025.11082076
  • Yu, J. S., & Yao, Y. (2026a). Agents and workflows. In Intelligent language services: Theory and practice with large language models (pp. 113–141). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-4632-9_5
  • Yu, J. S., & Yao, Y. (2026b). Designing translation agents: Principles and practice. In Intelligent language services: Theory and practice with large language models (pp. 225–250). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-4632-9_8
  • Zhang, C., He, S., Qian, J., Li, B., Li, L., Qin, S., & Zhang, Q. (2024). Large language model-brained GUI agents: A survey (arXiv:2411.18279). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.18279
  • Zhao, B., Foo, L. G., Hu, P., Theobalt, C., Rahmani, H., & Liu, J. (2025). LLM-based agentic reasoning frameworks: A survey from methods to scenarios (arXiv:2508.17692). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.17692
  • Zheng, Y., Chen, Y., & Hu, Y. (2025). AudAgent: Automated auditing of privacy policy compliance in AI agents (arXiv:2511.07441). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.07441.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Wali, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

    Department of Informatics Management, Faculty of Computer Science, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia

  • Muhammad Agha Afkar, Lembaga Mitra Solusi Teknologi Informasi (L-MSTI)

    Research Division, Lembaga Mitra Solusi Teknologi Informasi (L-MSTI), STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia

  • Syafrinal Syafrinal, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh

    Department of Computer System, Faculty of Computer Science, STMIK Indonesia Banda Aceh, Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province, Indonesia

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Wali, Muhammad Agha Afkar, Syafrinal Syafrinal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open-access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Under this license, you are free to:

  • Share: Copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
  • Adapt: Remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Attribution Requirements:
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

Copyright and Retention:
Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.

Usage Statistics