Daon Wira (Desa Daon Wirausaha): Transformasi Produk Lokal melalui Penguatan UMKM Menuju Ekonomi Desa Berkelanjutan

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59431/ajad.v6i3.1014

Keywords:

Community Empowerment, Ppk Ormawa, Kwt, Msmes, Business Management, Rural Economy

Abstract

This community engagement activity was implemented through the Student Organization Capacity Strengthening Program (PPK Ormawa) under the DAON WIRA program to strengthen the capacity of the Women Farmers Group (KWT) in Daon Village in developing local processed product businesses. The main challenges faced by the partner group included weak institutional management, unsystematic financial recording, and limited product development, packaging, legal compliance, and marketing. The program employed a participatory approach through needs assessment, training, mentoring, monitoring, and evaluation. Interventions were carried out through three interrelated initiatives: DAON WIRA, SAKU DESA, and GEMAR DESA, which focused on institutional strengthening, financial management, and product development and marketing. The results indicate an increase in institutional and business management capacities, supported by the preparation of basic financial analyses and business plans. This program has encouraged KWT to manage its enterprise more systematically, strategically, and sustainably.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Rania Aisyah Shaqi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Nur Andini Sulistia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Nayla Larasati Arinda Putri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Delta Nursyifa, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Siti Anisaah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Bimbi Riris Tri Astuti, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Fredy Wage Bimo Silitonga, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Aprilia Andini, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Cut Fatimah Keumala Putri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Zahra Puspita Sari, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Siti Awaliah Latifah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Muhammad Azka A.M, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Raihan Fajriansyah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Bayu Firmansyah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Galuh Rachman Yudhistira, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Angga Satria Winangku, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

  • Nur Muhamad Iqbal, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta

    Program Studi Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Kota/Kabupaten Tangerang Selatan, Provinsi Banten, Negara Indonesia.

References

Antlöv, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047

Banyard, V. L., Edwards, K. M., Rizzo, A. J., Segura-Montagut, A., Greenberg, P., & Kearns, M. C. (2023). Mixed methods community-engaged evaluation: Integrating interventionist and action research frameworks to understand a community-building violence prevention program. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 17(4), 350–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/15586898221108013

Bebbington, A., Dharmawan, L., Fahmi, E., & Guggenheim, S. (2006). Local capacity, village governance, and the World Bank in Indonesia. World Development, 34(11), 1958–1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.020

Bhawra, J., Cook, B., Weiss, J., Katapally, T. R., & The Voice of Youth Team. (2023). A guiding framework for needs assessment evaluations to embed digital platforms in partnership with Indigenous communities. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-023-01828-5

Bianchini, M., & Kwon, I. (2021). Enhancing SMEs’ resilience through digitalisation: The case of Korea. OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Papers, No. 27. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/23bd7a26-en

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12360

Devaux, A., Torero, M., Donovan, J., & Horton, D. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: A review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 8(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/JADEE-06-2017-0065

Huang, S., He, J., & Jiang, Z. (2024). Co-producing access(ible) knowledge: Methodological reflections on a community-based participatory research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241257947

OECD. (2021a). SMEs going digital: Policy challenges and recommendations. OECD Going Digital Toolkit Notes, No. 15. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c91088a4-en

OECD. (2021b). The digital transformation of SMEs. OECD Studies on SMEs and Entrepreneurship. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bdb9256a-en

OECD. (2023). OECD SME and Entrepreneurship Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/342b8564-en

Reed, M. S., Vella, S., Challies, E., de Vente, J., Frewer, L., Hohenwallner-Ries, D., Huber, T., Neumann, R. K., Oughton, E. A., Sidoli del Ceno, J., & van Delden, H. (2018). A theory of participation: What makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work? Restoration Ecology, 26(S1), S7–S17. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541

Widianingsih, I., McIntyre-Mills, J., & Wiradinata, R. (2019). Participatory action research and regional development in Indonesia: A systemic intervention approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 32(3), 263–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-018-9461-x

World Health Organization. (2023a). Social participation for universal health coverage: Technical paper. World Health Organization.

World Health Organization. (2023b). WHO framework for meaningful engagement of people living with noncommunicable diseases, and mental health and neurological conditions. World Health Organization.

Downloads

Published

2026-12-01

How to Cite

Shaqi, R. A., Sulistia, N. A., Arinda Putri, N. L., Nursyifa, D., Anisaah, S., Tri Astuti, B. R., Bimo Silitonga, F. W., Andini, A., Keumala Putri, C. F., Puspita Sari, Z., Awaliah Latifah, S., Azka A.M, M., Fajriansyah, R., Firmansyah, B., Yudhistira, G. R., Winangku, A. S., & Iqbal, N. M. (2026). Daon Wira (Desa Daon Wirausaha): Transformasi Produk Lokal melalui Penguatan UMKM Menuju Ekonomi Desa Berkelanjutan. AJAD : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(3), 642–652. https://doi.org/10.59431/ajad.v6i3.1014

Similar Articles

11-20 of 289

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.