Analisis Dinamika Sosial-Ekologis dan Keadilan Lingkungan: Keresahan dan Harapan Masyarakat terhadap Pembangunan Fasilitas Pergudangan di Desa Liang Anggang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59431/ajad.v6i3.949Keywords:
Environmental Justice, EIA Public Consultation, Socio-Ecological Dynamics, Warehousing Facility, Community ParticipationAbstract
The establishment of a 25,234 m² warehousing complex in Liang Anggang Village, Tanah Laut Regency, creates complex socio-ecological dynamics alongside local economic opportunities. This study evaluates community expectations and environmental concerns during the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA/AMDAL) public consultation. Primary data were collected from 16 key representatives and analyzed through thematic frequency mapping and qualitative evaluation. Findings reveal a pronounced disparity: socio-economic demands accounted for 82.8% of total inputs, prioritizing a 70% local labor quota, flexible educational requirements, vocational training, and BUMDes partnerships. Conversely, environmental issues comprised only 17.2%, addressing hazardous waste, wastewater treatment, traffic, and noise. This low environmental concern reflects structural socio-economic vulnerability and technical literacy barriers rather than minimal ecological risks. Consequently, this study outlines collaborative multi-stakeholder governance, transparent recruitment mechanisms, grievance channels, and participatory environmental monitoring to ensure environmental justice.
Downloads
References
Azmi, H. T. (2024). Penegakan hukum lingkungan terhadap pencemaran limbah industri: Tinjauan terhadap perlindungan masyarakat kelas bawah. LITRA: Jurnal Hukum Lingkungan, Tata Ruang dan Agraria, 4(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.23920/litra.v4i1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and becoming a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Calvert, J. (2026). How British Columbia is using a Community Benefits Agreement to implement progressive social and employment objectives in its construction industry. Community Development Journal, Article bsag005. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsag005
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ganning, J. P. (2025). What can Community Benefits Agreements learn from allied policies? Lessons from a systematic literature review. Journal of Planning Literature, 40(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854122241256388
Hoi, C. K., Wu, Q., & Zhang, H. (2018). Community social capital and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 647–665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3335-z
Latifah. (2025). Janji hijau dan keadilan sosial: Paradoks dalam transisi energi. Journal of Humanity and Social Justice, 7(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.38026/jhsj.v7i2
Lonergan, K. E., & Sansavini, G. (2025). Considering distributive justice as a planning principle helps navigate a diversity of future energy infrastructure designs. Nature Communications, 16(1), Article 10509. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-65526-0
Lyhne, C. N., Thisted, J., & Bjerrum, M. (2025). Qualitative content analysis–framing the analytical process of inductive content analysis to develop a sound study design. Quality & Quantity, 59(6), 5329–5349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02220-9
Medellu, S. S. B., & Ledo, E. L. (2021). Analisis perubahan pengaturan AMDAL dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja ditinjau dari perspektif asas kelestarian dan keberlanjutan. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 6(1), 45–58.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Moussa, E. F., Porto-Gómez, I., & Campos, J. A. (2026). The dynamics of collaborative governance: A life cycle perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-01-2025-0037
Noble, H., & Heale, R. (2019). Triangulation in research, with examples. Evidence-Based Nursing, 22(3), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145
Noor, R., Annisa, N., Alim, M. S., & Prasetia, H. (2023). Pendampingan implementasi teknik pembuangan air limbah dari kegiatan Rumah Sakit Islam Banjarmasin untuk memenuhi standar kualitas air limbah sebagai upaya mencegah cemaran lingkungan. Jurnal Pengabdian ILUNG (Inovasi Lahan Basah Unggul), 3(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.20527/ilung.v3i1
PT Indomarco Adi Prima. (2025). Analisis dampak lingkungan hidup (ANDAL) rencana pembangunan fasilitas pergudangan di Desa Liang Anggang, Kecamatan Bati-Bati, Kabupaten Tanah Laut. Tim Penyusun AMDAL PT Indomarco Adi Prima.
Putra, A., & Oktaviana, D. (2025). Quo vadis environmental participation rights: A review of Indonesian Constitutional Court’s decision. Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(2), 229–259. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2222
Sadiawati, D., Supriyadi, M. W., Achmad, M. M., & Sahidin, S. A. (2026). Rekayasa sosial hukum dan partisipasi bermakna: Dinamika dan paradoks transisi energi matahari di Indonesia. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 10807–10813. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.4459
Saputra, E., Annisa, N., Rizky, M., & Darmawan, C. (2025). Peran Analisis Mengenai Dampak Lingkungan dalam mewujudkan tujuan Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPS, 3(4), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.62383/sosial.v3i4.1375
Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199286294.001.0001
Yo’el, S. M., Priyono, F. X. J., & Samekto, F. X. A. (2024). Implementasi hukum lingkungan internasional dalam hukum nasional Indonesia. Diversi Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.29303/jkh.v6i2.82
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rijali Noor, Nova Annisa, Karisadini Karisadini
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
